Prince Charles and David Ha-Melech: A Tribute

My name is Mia Lipman, and I never made it through Infinite Jest. In fact, you couldn't pay me enough to read most of David Foster Wallace's fiction to the end.

DFWGo ahead—revoke my literary credentials. I'll pretend to understand. But if I've learned anything from working as an editor and critic for the past dozen years, it's that the world is too rich in great writing for me to finish a book I'm not enjoying. The next one in the stack is always right there, batting its Garamond eyes.

That said: The Cult of DFW has a point. Wallace's writing was rich, his brain a diamond mine, and his early death left a gaping hole in modern thought. Many of his essays were masterful, especially this one, and he was hot in the way a man in coveralls with dirt under his nails can melt college girls into butter and sugar.

I have a bias against footnotes, coupled with an inherent distaste for ponderous tomes that extends to the Russian masters and horrified many of my professors—but that doesn't mean I don't get it. Wallace was a mad genius cut from the classical self-destructive mold. He did what poets seek to do: interpret the intangible in a way the rest of us can't begin to imagine but can immediately recognize. I saw him read once in a church in San Francisco; he looked like a lumberjack and seemed to be gently spoiling for a fight. Nobody could stop staring.

Today would have been David Foster Wallace's 50th birthday, and it's a damn shame he's no longer here to practice his craft. Lord knows his work spoke volumes, even if it didn't always speak to me.

ChuckAs it happens, another mind bender was born the same day DFW shuffled on this mortal coil: Chuck Palahniuk, who's still very much alive. The author of Fight Club and Damned uses one word for every hundred of Wallace's, but their writing shares an inability to be categorized or, thus far, successfully imitated. 

Often hailed by adjectives like "eccentric" and "transgressional," Palahniuk's fiction is so bizarre and otherworldly that I've never quite understood its widespread popularity. Except when he pulls off lines like this: "It's green the way a pool table with green felt looks under the yellow 1 ball, not the way it looks under the red 3."

Again with the poetry. Again with a raised glass, even from those of us who earn our keep by finding chinks in the armor.

Happy 50th, David and Chuck. I don't get it, but I absolutely get it.

Leave a Comment

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this blog until approved.

Comments (2)

Ha! I love that someone else has the guts to admit that this type of writing (while it can certainly be appreciated) is not for them! I love reading, and there are so many books out I really have to suffer through a depressing tome that I'm not enjoying to maintain my self-respect?

Posted by: Chris | Wednesday February 22, 2012 at 1:35 AM

I've read Infinite Jest three times. I do not have the balls to say I understand all of it, but I do find it wildly entertaining. I had a book club of mine read it many years ago (I had already read it once). The plan was to read it in quarters and meet to discuss. They groaned and groaned but I said "If you aren't hooked after the first 250 pages or so, you can give up." They persevered and they were all hooked.

Posted by: dmf | Tuesday February 21, 2012 at 10:44 AM

Lists + Reviews

Best Books Literature + Fiction Nonfiction Kids + Young Adult Mystery, Thriller + Suspense Science Fiction + Fantasy Comics + Graphic Novels Romance Eating + Drinking


Interviews Guest Essays Celebrity Picks

News + Features

News Features Awards


Omnivoracious, The Amazon Book Review

Feeds Facebook Twitter YouTube