Because if you leave him off a list of great British writers since 1945, you just look stupid!
I understand the logic, but penalizing Greene because he wrote a great book before Hitler invaded Poland seems a little arbitrary. Greene is the demented poet laureate of the 20th Century, and along with George Orwell (who comes in at #2) he will still define post-imperial Britain five hundred years from now.
Otherwise, it’s not a bad list. Great to see Roald Dahl there: 2007 has been my year of Roald, and in April I’ll most likely be paying a visit with my family to the Roald Dahl Museum outside of London. And Rosemary Sutcliff! I’ve been working my way through her novels for a few years now, and there is no better chronicler of Roman Britain.
A few of the choices are little-known in the US: Alan Garner, whose haunting Red Shift I read a few months ago (speaking of Roman Britain, he uses it as a metaphor for Vietnam); and Geoffrey Hill, a very fine poet. I’ve never heard of George Mackay Brown or Alice Oswald, but both sound intriguing.
Larkin at the top is a bit of a surprise, but a great choice, though it would have left him vaguely out-of-sorts until he’d written a cheeky letter about it to Kingsley Amis (who’s on the list too, along with his son). And Tolkien? The books left me cold (so did the movies) but he’s obviously had a huge effect on British culture. Ian Fleming seems to have snuck in for the same reason (I’m listening to James Bond title songs as I type this).
Finally, regarding Golding: yes, Lord of the Flies is good fun, but The Inheritors is a genuinely alienating book, in the best way, about a small clan of Neanderthals encountering a nasty new species of hominid. It is weird, wild stuff, and like most Golding you just need to accept that you won’t understand half of what’s happening and roll with it.