
Physician and professor
Oliver Sacks is the author of
The Man Who
Mistook His Wife for a Hat,
Awakenings,
and
Musicophilia, among many other works. A few months ago,
Dr. Sacks—whose moving, fascinating collections of case studies nearly
convinced this diehard fiction reader to major in neuroscience instead of
literature—graciously welcomed me into his New York City study to discuss his
latest book.
Hallucinations, fresh off the presses today, is one of our
Best Books of the Month selections for November.
Mia Lipman: In Hallucinations, you mention that your childhood migraines
are one of the reasons you became a neurologist. How did they help shape your
path?
Dr. Sacks: My experiences go back to my first memories of
when I was three or four, suddenly seeing a brilliant zigzag which seemed to be
vibrating, then enlarged and covered everything to one side. This has happened
innumerable times since, but that first time was very terrifying…I know I was
in the garden, and part of the garden wall seemed to disappear, and I asked my
mother about it. She too had classical migraines, so she explained what it was
about and said that it was benign and it would only last a few minutes, and I'd
be none the worse. So though I'm not in love
with the attacks, it's nice to know that one can live with this quite well.
So that early
experience made you curious about why this was happening to you?
Indeed, and there were other experiences. Sometimes it was
just color, perhaps in one half of the visual field, or things would be frozen
and I couldn't see any movement. So I think this gave me a very early feeling
that it's only the privilege of a normal brain which allows us to see the way
we do—and that what seems to be a simple vision in fact must have dozens of
different components, and any one of these can go down. So it was a learning
experience for me as well.
Speaking of learning
experiences, you talk in the book about a period in your 30s when you did a lot
of hallucinogenic drugs—
Ah, I thought that would come up. [Laughing.]
Of course, it's the
best part! I especially liked your description of the results as "a mix of
the neurological and the divine." What did this self-experimentation teach
you about your field, as well as personally?
I can't conceal that my motives
were sort of mixed, but these were learning experiences as well as recreational
ones, and occasionally terrifying ones. The gain, I think, [is that] it's a way
of revealing various capacities and incapacities in the brain, including, perhaps,
mystical ones…I quote William James, who, after taking nitrous oxide, said that
it showed him there were many forms of consciousness other than rational
consciousness, and that these seem to be uncovered one by one. And that's quite
an experience. I do not recommend it to anybody, and I hope my writing about
these things is not seen as a recommendation. I think I'm very lucky to have
survived them, which several of my friends and contemporaries didn't.
The cornerstone
condition in Hallucinations is
Charles Bonnet syndrome, or CBS. Will you please describe CBS and tell us why you chose
to center the book on this condition?
I see lots of elderly people who are hearing impaired or
visually impaired but quite articulate and intact intellectually. In general,
the hearing impaired get musical hallucinations and, even more commonly, the
visually impaired can get visual hallucinations of a complex and dramatic
character. These were described in the middle of the 18th century by a Swiss
naturalist, Charles Bonnet, and we speak now of Charles Bonnet syndrome. It
used to be regarded—when I say "used to," I mean until 1990—as very rare, with
only a few dozen cases reported. But it's now obvious that it affects between
10 and 20 percent of people with significant visual impairment. But like all
hallucinatory experiences, people are frightened to mention it, and one may
only get an account of it when there's a nice, trusting relationship between
the patient and the doctor.
[CBS] can be very frightening, as it was for the old lady
Rosalie whom I describe. But she was hugely relieved when I could say,
"You're not mad, you're not demented, you're not on anything, and this is a normal reaction of your brain to being
blind." And I told her about Charles Bonnet, and she was very tickled by
it.
She liked to have it named.
Yes, yes—she said, "Tell the nurses I have Charles
Bonnet syndrome." I speak about a very different sort of hallucinatory
experience she had when she thought she was dying, and I didn't know whether I
should add that, in fact, she survived and is now enjoying her 99th year.
That's wonderful to know. I'd also like to explore the section on auditory hallucinations, particularly the cases where people hear voices when they're in serious danger. Are these recognized in retrospect as inner commands, or do some patients continue to believe it was an outside voice?
Well, it may depend on the person somewhat. Freud, no less,
described this himself on two occasions when he was in mortal peril: hearing a
voice, he said, as "a shout in the ear," saying "this is the
end"—and at the same time seeing the words printed in midair. On the other
hand, when he heard the voice of his fiancée occasionally when he was a lonely
young man in Paris, he wondered if there was something, I want to say,
paranormal. He wondered if there was some telepathy, and he would always note
down the exact time and try and check. In fact, nothing ever happened.
That must have been very disappointing.
He was perhaps disappointed and relieved. I mention in a
different context, in a chapter on epilepsy, a woman who heard a voice—God's
voice—telling her to run for Congress. [Laughs.]
And she followed it?
She followed it. And she advertised it, and people
thought, "Well, you know, if God suggested it…"
I wonder how she did in the polls.
She did very well. It had always been a strongly Democratic district, but she almost tipped it the other way.